Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmprlry-e/PALINDROME_nokinds-noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ISNELIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ISQID(activate(I))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(V) → U11¹(isNeList(activate(V)))
ISPAL(V) → U81¹(isNePal(activate(V)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ACTIVATE(n__o) → O
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
U41¹(tt, V2) → U42¹(isNeList(activate(V2)))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ACTIVATE(n__nil) → NIL
ISPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__i) → I
ACTIVATE(n__e) → E
ISNELIST(V) → U31¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNEPAL(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U21¹(tt, V2) → U22¹(isList(activate(V2)))
ISNEPAL(V) → U61¹(isQid(activate(V)))
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(I)
U51¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNEPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
U71¹(tt, P) → U72¹(isPal(activate(P)))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__a) → A
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(P)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n__u) → U
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → __¹(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → U52¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U71¹(tt, P) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
ISLIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ISNELIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ISQID(activate(I))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(V) → U11¹(isNeList(activate(V)))
ISPAL(V) → U81¹(isNePal(activate(V)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ACTIVATE(n__o) → O
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
U41¹(tt, V2) → U42¹(isNeList(activate(V2)))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ACTIVATE(n__nil) → NIL
ISPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__i) → I
ACTIVATE(n__e) → E
ISNELIST(V) → U31¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNEPAL(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U21¹(tt, V2) → U22¹(isList(activate(V2)))
ISNEPAL(V) → U61¹(isQid(activate(V)))
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(I)
U51¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNEPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
U71¹(tt, P) → U72¹(isPal(activate(P)))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__a) → A
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(P)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n__u) → U
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → __¹(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → U52¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U71¹(tt, P) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
ISLIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 4 SCCs with 32 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (5/2)x_1 + x_2
POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 7/2 + (5/4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(nil) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 0
POL(a) = 1/4
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (5/4)x_1 + x_2
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(e) = 1/2
POL(U71¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + x_2
POL(n__i) = 0
POL(n__e) = 1/2
POL(activate(x₁)) = x_1
POL(n__nil) = 0
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (5/4)x_1 + x_2
POL(o) = 0
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__a) = 1/4
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(ISPAL(x₁)) = x_1
POL(u) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ISNEPAL(x₁)) = x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

o → n__o
__(X, nil) → X
i → n__i
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
activate(n__nil) → nil
u → n__u
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
e → n__e
a → n__a
__(nil, X) → X
activate(n__u) → u
activate(n__o) → o
activate(X) → X
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__e) → e

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 4
POL(U51¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (1/4)x_2
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 5/4 + (5/2)x_1 + x_2
POL(n__i) = 4
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (1/4)x_2
POL(activate(x₁)) = x_1
POL(n__nil) = 2
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(U51(x₁, x₂)) = (5/2)x_1
POL(n__a) = 4
POL(tt) = 0
POL(U52(x₁)) = 0
POL(U11(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 2
POL(a) = 4
POL(isList(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1
POL(e) = 0
POL(n__e) = 0
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 5/4 + (5/2)x_1 + x_2
POL(o) = 0
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂)) = (1/4)x_2
POL(U31(x₁)) = 4
POL(U41(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(u) = 0
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 0
POL(U42(x₁)) = (3/2)x_1
POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = (1/4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

o → n__o
i → n__i
activate(n__nil) → nil
u → n__u
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
e → n__e
a → n__a
activate(n__u) → u
activate(n__o) → o
activate(X) → X
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__e) → e
__(X, nil) → X
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(nil, X) → X

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.